Tuesday, 26 June 2012
‘True Love’ - BBC - started Sunday 17th June 2012
(Rated 3/5)
This was a great idea - some of the UK's top actors - David Tennant, David Morrissey, Jane Horrocks, Lacey Turner, Vicky McClure, Billie Piper - improvising their way through stories of love - and in some cases it worked beautifully and naturally - but there was also some highly cliched and cringe-inducing lines and less than good acting. I felt things improved as the series went on - David Morrissey's being the most impressive and unpredictable. Jane Horrocks' episode was also moving to me - though sadly I felt Charlie Creed Miles let the side down as her husband, who seemed unable to portray feeling. Lacey Turner showed us again that she is stunning at being traumatised. Billie Piper came across very girly but was touching in her lesbian love story. I did want and expect better from others though. Long live WRITERS! :)
True Love – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2012
http://www.facebook.com/TheRestrictedReview
Twitter: @RestrictReview
Saturday, 23 June 2012
‘The Rest is Silence’ - Riverside Studios - Thursday 21st June 2012
(Rated 4/5 )
Please Note: If you want to skip the pre-show drama then please go
straight to 'AND FINALLY'
The drama around
booking, potentially unbooking and going to see or rapidly-limping a mile from
this highly unusual production of Hamlet,
was almost more dramatic than the play itself - though actually this was more
like a black farce than one of the greatest tragedies of all time. Loving Hamlet, I felt very excited at the
prospect of seeing something that was billed as a dreamlike meditation on it.
Of all the offerings from The World Shakespeare Festival, this was the one
which most appealed and I booked well in advance. So much so as not to know
what the unusual aspects entailed. As the friend who went with me later
commented, the least you expect from going to the theatre is to sit in a seat
for the performance and watch the actors in front of you on stage - that said
of course in Shakespeare's time those in the pit did not have that luxury.
Weeks later an email comes regarding seating for the performance. There is
none! In addition those who suffer from claustrophobia are advised to ring the
box office to discuss that. Yikes! I have suffered from that a couple of times
- on both occasions stuck in an MRI machine to analyse my hips - thank goodness
it was my hips and not higher up in my body - I think to have had my head in
that machine would have created a major claustrophobia-induced panic attack.
And so I rang - I explained that I fall (no pun intended) into both categories
- disabled and claustrophobic. So I got assigned a shooting stick - I explained
I have a walking seat and could bring that, but the reply was that no, I must
not do that and must use one the allocated sticks. Okay. So then I asked about
what might induce claustrophobia. It's explained to me that the production
takes place in a confined space, the auditorium is blacked out, with just a few
lights around the promenade by which the audience can see. OMG! I said I need
to think about whether I can manage all that and was told I can cancel the
booking if I do so by a certain date. My friend had previously thought it all
sounded exciting. So we discussed her maybe going with someone else if I
couldn't manage - meanwhile I swung from 'Oh yes I can do it' to 'How mad to put
myself through agony and potential panic attacks - possibly a trip to A&E -
for some poncy art'. We did even get to the point of giving up on it as I would
have had to go anyway to collect on my credit card... I phoned to cancel in
time and was told I could not as they have a no cancellation policy! A case of
different people saying different things. So friend and I resigned ourselves to
going and agreed that if I couldn't cope we'd just have a drink instead. As it
came closer to the time I wound myself up a little more and almost had panic
attacks thinking about what could possibly go wrong. The night before we
decided we should also book to eat before the show - last time at the
Riverside, the restaurant was packed. I rang to try to do so and, after getting
a bizarre noise on the phone twice before, managed to get through the third
time. Apparently the restaurant area was booked for an event, but if we wished
we could use the film cafe at the front of the building.
On the evening concerned, I met friend. She suggested we eat
somewhere else before we go to the Riverside. Thank goodness she did. We got to
Riverside Studios to find the film cafe was closed! Our response was humour at
this point. In fact so much so that I'd forgotten to be worried. Then the worry
was triggered again by the safety sheet we were given with out tickets - it
warned us again of what we were facing - standing in a confined space for 90
mins, nudity and a loud bang - leaving us to imagine all of all the possible
calamities that may get triggered as a result! After my palpitations at the
Donmar from the double dose of male nudity I was adding in yet another thing
that could send me to A&E. We came up with our own little strategy. If
either of us couldn't cope we'd leave but the other could stay if they were
enjoying it. And we'd text to let the other know whether we'd left and gone
home or were waiting out of the confined space.
It was almost time and we were called to Studio 2. We followed
directions, only to be told we were going the wrong way and had to go out of
the building and round the side to join a queue to go in. Again, I started to
imagine 'bad' reasons why there might be a queue!
AND FINALLY we were in the purpose-built confined-space set/theatre
for The Rest is Silence. It was quite
a large room in which we could all freely walk. Neither the 'lift-size' nor the
restricted-raised corridor-like promenade I had imagined/feared. So I felt no
danger from claustrophobia- or acrophobia-induced panic attacks. I tried out
sitting on the shooting stick - it seemed okay though a little hard to balance,
but using my own stick as well seemed okay. I felt as ready as I could be :).
Around us the walls appeared black. A circle of dim lights lit the room from
the ceiling. And then they went out. For a few seconds we were in pitch black -
'Keep breathing, it's all okay' self-talk - and then meditative music. I'm
okay! This is nice. A film on one wall of the death of Hamlet's father
(Thorston Manderlay). And then on comes light revealing a room built within
another wall - a bedroom - a naked Claudius (Phillip Edgerley) waking abruptly
after a nightmare. He dresses - that's the nudity done and I'm still okay. And
so the action carries on. We are introduced to Hamlet (Edward Hogg), Gertrude (Ruth
Lass), Ophelia (Bethan Cullinane), Polonius (Richard Clews) and Laertes (Ben
Ingles). In fact, in this version of the story, there are just two more
characters - the humour-providing Rosencrantz (Michael Bryher) and Guildenstern
(Stewart Heffernan) - to join the unmerry band. This is a much shortened
version of the play, and though all mixed up with dialogue from different
scenes put together in one, all the text used is from the original
Shakespeare's Hamlet. The action
takes place in different rooms built into the walls all around the main
auditorium. I was very impressed. It gives the feeling of all the characters
being restricted, confined, imprisoned by their beliefs, conceptions and lack
of trust in each other. It has the audience - who ironically in this situation,
and contrary to expectation, feel more free than the characters, questioning
all these things in themselves. In fact in some ways it did indeed - as
intended by the company dreamthinkspeak
- raise new perspectives and insights into the conflicts, feelings and themes
of the play. 'Get thee to a nunnery' now becomes a scene with Hamlet
challenging Ophelia and Gertrude - which makes sense psychologically - his
feelings and relationship with his mother impacting on that with Ophelia. 'To be
or not to be' becomes a meditation by the whole cast - done in staggered
unison; round. This and the rest of the production actually make it feel like
all the characters are equal in this piece. Hamlet isn't the lead role any
more. If anything I felt Claudius and Gertrude had more to do. And Rosencrantz
and Guildernstern also made a greater impression than in other productions I
have seen. The use of film as well - for R&G in a kind of life-raft out at
sea and Ophelia's drowning contributed beautifully to the whole feeling of the
piece. And I did feel even more at one with the actors watching them in their
personal spaces (living-rooms, bedrooms, offices) going through their traumas
and psychological journeys - just perspex between us. All were good. If anything
I found Hamlet himself slightly lacking BUT I have seen some absolutely superb
embodiments of him - most notable for me David Tennant - and with dialogue
taken away from him, in a sense he was somewhat disabled in potential.
The audience moved around a fair bit - I noticed like me - those
with shooting sticks were using them to lean on rather than sit on - they
didn't feel very stable! I stayed in the same general area. For the finale I
found myself in the front row centre. As the cast took their bows we applauded.
They were all smiles. I was absolutely beaming. Such a shared experience! And
that was acknowledged in a sense by them applauding us too. We'd done through
the trauma, drama, psychology of the play and been challenged psychologically
and physically too - what an achievement - and actually well worth it.
The Rest is Silence – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2012
Twitter: @RestrictReview
Thursday, 21 June 2012
‘Antigone’ - National Olivier Theatre - Wednesday 20th June 2012
(Rated 4/5 )
This last of my Antigone reviews will be short. Please do check out the others for more information.
Just wanted to add a few comments on my experience of the performance last night.
The whole thing progressed more quickly - made it feel punchier. That said - for me - the whole play is still too laboured and like a discussion of the same issues over and over again. That's fine, but in a way, lacks dramatic potential in a more emotional sense. The most emotion is felt - and that's significant I guess - from Jamie Ballard as the prophet Teiresias - he cannot see and so he feels, whilst the others see, think and analyse too much.
That said, Jodie Whittaker in her last scene as Antigone - facing death and bemoaning the loss of being a wife and mother - moved me much more than in previous performances. And I really believed Chris Eccleston as the broken man Creon. At last I felt empathy for his plight in the position he is in as a leader doing his best to maintain order in difficult circumstances, how in that position he feels he has to put first what he thinks is best for Thebes, rather than his own family, but at such an enormous personal cost to himself and the lives of those he loves. He is left with nothing. He is nothing. I literally felt empty as he said that.
I know for many it is hard to afford what I am about to write! Thanks to the lower prices of some of London's theatres, such as The National, this can be possible. I LOVE the experience of seeing a play several times during its run. I have seen a progression and development. I've also enjoyed the different choices the actors have made. And I have come to increasingly understand and appreciate the messages of Antigone. Over time The play and characters have come to life and debated with me and the rest of the audience, making me think about many different issues, which the play triggers. And that's how the theatrical experience ought to be. Thanks to all involved!
Just wanted to add a few comments on my experience of the performance last night.
The whole thing progressed more quickly - made it feel punchier. That said - for me - the whole play is still too laboured and like a discussion of the same issues over and over again. That's fine, but in a way, lacks dramatic potential in a more emotional sense. The most emotion is felt - and that's significant I guess - from Jamie Ballard as the prophet Teiresias - he cannot see and so he feels, whilst the others see, think and analyse too much.
That said, Jodie Whittaker in her last scene as Antigone - facing death and bemoaning the loss of being a wife and mother - moved me much more than in previous performances. And I really believed Chris Eccleston as the broken man Creon. At last I felt empathy for his plight in the position he is in as a leader doing his best to maintain order in difficult circumstances, how in that position he feels he has to put first what he thinks is best for Thebes, rather than his own family, but at such an enormous personal cost to himself and the lives of those he loves. He is left with nothing. He is nothing. I literally felt empty as he said that.
I know for many it is hard to afford what I am about to write! Thanks to the lower prices of some of London's theatres, such as The National, this can be possible. I LOVE the experience of seeing a play several times during its run. I have seen a progression and development. I've also enjoyed the different choices the actors have made. And I have come to increasingly understand and appreciate the messages of Antigone. Over time The play and characters have come to life and debated with me and the rest of the audience, making me think about many different issues, which the play triggers. And that's how the theatrical experience ought to be. Thanks to all involved!
Antigone – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2012
Twitter: @RestrictReview
Wednesday, 13 June 2012
‘Antigone’ - National Olivier Theatre - Sunday 10th June 2012
(Rated 4/5 )
And now I can
genuinely give this production a higher score J (Please see my previous review of opening preview night.) This time I
really felt emotions, thought hard with the characters about the issues,
arguments and conflicts and felt completely engaged with what was going on.
Well done to all! As I said before maybe it wasn’t fair of me to review the
very first performance and expect so much, but that said I have seen other
previews that certainly affected me much more and were more engaging. This time
I felt confident and safely carried along with the drama. Last time I felt
highly anxious, willing the cast to do well, but cringing that it wasn’t
happening for me.
On this occasion
I went with a small group of people. We had a brilliant time during the play
and discussing over a meal afterwards. The following incorporates reactions
from us all and thank you to my friends for their interesting, insightful and
entertaining comments and allowing me to add them to my review.
The theme of
this play is tyranny. This time that fully came across – not simply the
tyrannical Creon, but also the bullying from Antigone, who in some ways, and in
some cultures old and contemporary could be seen as a terrorist herself. Jodie
Whittaker as Antigone was less the petulant child she had seemed before, and
Christopher Eccleston’s Creon’s internal self-deliberation was visible. Their
debates felt like bullets aiming at and hitting their targets even though those
targets were not outwardly wounded. Yet I did feel the wounds between father;
Creon and son; Haemon as they verbally and physically fought over their views
and the condemnation of the Haemon’s betrothed, Antigone. Big shout out goes to
Luke Newberry – I was moved by Haemon’s truth and he made impact on his
unbending father to the point of Creon having to literally attempt to beat the
opposition out of his son, with an effort so strong that he split his shirt open,
scattering buttons and revealing his strapped-up chest. Creon-Chris rapidly
pulled himself together in a way that felt so much the character rather than
the actor trying to protect his dignity. Chris was convincing to the majority
of us, to the point of forgetting it was him rather than Creon, though one of
us did think “Creon was mediocre”.
Later in the
play a messenger, played by Kobna Holdbrook-Smith has to inform Creon’s wife Eurydice
– ZoĆ« Aldrich – of her son’s fate. This was such an emotive interaction both by
the informer and the mother. It reminded me of several scene-elements in
Shakespeare in which one character is giving news of, or experiences of another
character that we never see. It obviously disobeys the playwriting rule of show
not tell, and yet when the mother’s reaction is this important and this well
performed it is a more poignant choice.
Many different
choices were made this time in performance, in particular by Chris Eccleston.
Even though playing a tense character, he seemed more relaxed and in tune with
the process, as were the rest of the cast, maybe taking his lead and all going
with the process – still split in their views but more connected in their
delivery.
The entire
audience seemed to sense the piece on this occasion. Creon got many laughs –
some maybe in shock - in particular with his “These women are neurotic”. How familiar
is that to many of us, perhaps more so as women, from men who don’t seem to
have time for feelings and are in positions where they are obliged to put
matters of state or work before family and relationships. Of course it can also
reflect differences between men and women in any case in matters of the head or
heart. I suppose what was sad and disappointing about this version of the play
and what it brought up was there seemed to be little anger, sadness or even
indignation from the audience. Antigone and her sister Ismene (Annabel Scholey)
are facing death at this point and yet we don’t feel it’s as catastrophic or
final as that. This piece almost feels more like a black comedy than a tragedy.
With all the
fatalities and Creon’s anguished cry of “I am nothing” at the end, we ‘ought’
to feel how absolutely devastating this all is. But I still did not. And this
time I was sitting in a really good seat to see everything. I hate to say it –
yes I promise Chris Eccleston remains one of my greatest stage-loves – but at
that point I didn’t feel a truly broken man, but someone acting that and in a
few minutes he’ll be out of character and smiling at curtain call. And so he
did to deservedly enthusiastic applause from the audience. And this time also
the actors returned for a second time, led by Christopher and Jodie alone for a few
moments, before welcoming back the rest of the cast, with a big smile on Chris’
face as he checks both sides that everyone is together before leading the bows.
I’d like to
give – oh gosh this sounds like an acceptance speech and it so isn’t ;) – a final
shout out to Michael Grady-Hall, who performs for longest in this production,
as he patiently watched the monitor showing the progress of the battle between
Antigone’s brothers, and makes notes on what he sees – a reflection of The
Lives of Others.
This was for
sure “better than staying in with Columbo”.
P.S. At this
point in many of my reviews I am giving my experience of the theatre itself –
this I have already done with The National Olivier Theatre. But I would like to
write a little about Chris himself. And at this point Chris feels more
appropriate than Christopher. As you may have gathered from some of my previous
Restricted Reviews I enjoy meeting the actors afterwards at the stage door and
as themselves – or maybe I should say as much of themselves as they are able to
regain having lent much to their character. I have encountered Christopher a
few times. Understandably ‘outside’ he has been a little closed off in a kind-of
public-persona. I can fully empathise with that. This time, after one of his Antigone
performances, I felt I was meeting Chris. He was relaxed, charming,
appreciative and funny. He took in comments about the production, thanked us
and said he’d pass them on to the rest of the cast. He cheerily joked with
myself and a friend about the process of autograph-signing and photo-taking and
made sure that everyone got their turn and all they wanted from the experience.
A generous, kind-hearted gent!
Antigone – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2012
Twitter: @RestrictReview
Friday, 25 May 2012
‘Antigone’ Preview - National Olivier Theatre - Wednesday 23rd May 2012
(Rated 3/5 )
I absolutely
longed to give this production a higher score. I do wonder if I went in with
massively high expectations, which simply could not be satisfied. Why so much
expectation? Well the play itself is a classic – probably one of the most
famous of the Ancient Greek Tragedies – the power and impact of which is
enduring as it addresses issues that remain with us today: Conflicts between
the state and the individual, dictatorships, authority full of perhaps high IQ
but controlling rigidity that will not allow any emotional intelligence through
- leading to battles between legal laws and laws of the heart, law in dispute
with morality, familial love set against a father or uncle’s need to dominate,
male versus female in a society in which the former merits more than the
latter… the head versus the heart. And in this particular production one of my
favourite actors, whom I have longed to see on stage more – and so has he
longed to be ;) – following his many wonderfully powerful screen performances,
Christopher Eccleston. I think I have been spoiled by seeing many superb
productions in recent times so I have become quite demanding! Or perhaps
Ancient Greek Tragedy does not work for me ;).
The plot
surrounds an issue of burial. Brothers Eteocles and Polynices, sons of Oedipus
and his mother/wife Jocasta, have killed each other in battle. The new King
Creon has decreed that Eteocles be respected as a hero, but Polynices condemned
as a traitor. This means that the latter cannot be buried. Antigone, sister to both,
wishes to bury Polynices. If she does so and is discovered her punishment will
be death.
Polly Findlay's production
of the play is set in our contemporary time. The male characters are dressed in
the main in suits – I was hoping for togas – and Antigone - played by Jodie
Whittaker - and sister Ismene – Annabel Scholey – in dresses. The set is a
cold/stark/dark room full of offices in which are a multitude of desks, office
chairs and numerous staff. It swivels round to reveal an outside wall.
Don Taylor’s
play script, adapted from the original by Sophocles, contains numerous orations
from both sides of the argument, which to me felt somehow disconnected. I
wonder, however, if that was how plays were produced at the time – each actor
going to the front of the stage and delivering his part as though in monologue,
and then the next had a turn. I don’t mean that the arguments themselves were
disengaged or did not follow on from each other, but I felt a lack of
connection between the actors. And I honestly can’t put my finger on what
wasn’t working for me. Jodie Whittaker did come from the heart. And Christopher
Eccleston strongly from the power-crazed Creon – he was believable as a harsh,
willful dictator. And I suppose these characters are not supposed to connect so
that would make sense. However, I think what was lacking for me is I didn’t
feel them really challenging each other. I wanted more! It was as though they
were committed to their own sides of the argument, but not to convincing the
other person. More pressure and battering needed J. This was a preview – in fact the very first night of previews – so I
am sure that will develop. Perhaps on a first night actors are a little
careful. I would also say there were a few structural problems in the play
itself – again may come from the original author. Numerous supporting cast whom
we don’t really get to know – I imagine these are the chorus of Ancient Greek
Tragedy. But Creon’s son’s mother is introduced so late in the piece and has
only one scene effectively. I missed seeing her relationship with Creon and
son. There again, how important was a woman in those days? Antigone herself in
fact has a relatively small part considering she is the title role. The main
character is Creon and the story is his process and possible transformation.
And does he transform? I won’t give the game away. In fact the game wasn’t
given away to me either – I was unfortunately in a seat to which Christopher’s
back was turned in a crucial scene towards the end so missed the emotion.
There is so
much potential in this and I am sure it will be realised as they progress
towards the end of the run. I look forward to that J.
Antigone – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2012
Twitter: @RestrictReview
‘Being Friends’, ‘Lost’ and ‘Making Noise Quietly’ - Donmar Warehouse - Thursday 17th May 2012
(Rated 3/5 )
Billed as three
short plays by Robert Holman, these still felt long. Linked by war in that
different wars served as backdrops or backstories for the characters, they each
dealt with numerous issues around connection between people, families, trauma,
loss, truth and lies, secrets, youth and age and so much more. The dialogue
rang true and was full of subtext for the actors to work with… and the acting was
good mostly, but the production felt slow and stagnant. The Donmar stage is
small but I have seen much more movement and pace in other productions so it is
not the space that is a problem.
Matthew Tennyson and Jordan Dawes start with Being
Friends, the story of a young farmer and young artist meeting,
becoming friends and then maybe more. Matthew Tennyson impressed whilst Jordan
Dawes seemed to hold back feeling from his lines a little. It would have all
been in the subtext. I maybe had trouble feeling that due to the smoke from the
stage making its way up to the circle and starting my nose running. Then I
started to steam as both young men undressed to full frontal nudity. Ahem! That
was the most exciting part of that particular play.
I don’t think I had recovered from Being
Friends before Lost got underway. In fact it took me longer than
that – I must get out or stay in with my guy more ;). Lost really
suffered from lack of movement. Once, or maybe twice, the two characters
swapped their polar locations on the stage and sat when they’d been standing
before. There was such an undercurrent of potential emotional action though yet this
lack in motion was not enough to move me and my companion. Perhaps it was expected that the
undercurrents would but sadly they didn’t come through for us. May Appleton (played by Susan Brown), is being told that her son has been lost in war by officer
Geoffrey Church (John Hollingworth), as they both work through difficult issues
around family ties that bind or do not.
And finally, and perhaps most moving, Making
Noise Quietly brings together three highly traumatised disparate individuals;
a boy who won’t speak (Jack Boulter), a holocaust survivor now artist (Sara
Kestelman) and the war-induced PTSD-suffering ‘step-father’ (Ben Batt) of the
boy. Can they break through the noise of the unsaid, understand and help each
other?
The best parts though were the transitions
between scenes – the entire cast on stage showing us how their characters were
feeling and being in their lives - providing most activity on stage. Though
silent it was the noisiest part – making noise quietly!
Making Noise Quietly – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2012
Twitter: @RestrictReview
‘Travelling Light’ - National Lyttelton Theatre - Thursday 26th April 2012
(Rated 3.5/5 )
This is a
delightful little play by Nicholas Wright about the discovery of movies and
what makes them work. It is set in a Jewish shtetl (small town) and, though the
characters are in fact fictional, based on the stories of many of the real life
pioneers of the motion picture business in America, who came from such
communities in Poland, Russia, Hungary…, we feel the magical emotion of the
underlying real life stories, experiences and insights set before our eyes as
though happening in the moment.
The entire cast
are good, but Sir Anthony Sher puts them all to shame as timber-merchant Jacob
Bindel. His performance is truly phenomenal in warmth, humour, drama, poignancy
and sensitivity. He totally convinces as a Jew of the time – to those of us
maybe who were/are not! His character was not to become the successful movie
mogul in Hollywood – that honour went to Motl Mendl (Damien Molony) who was to
become Maurice Montgomery (Paul Jesson) – but, as many of the time and also now,
he was the one with the big ideas to never get the credit. He understood how to
convey emotion (without words) on film and what would make a great story. And
it was Motl’s love interest, Anna Mazowiecka (Lauren O’Neil), who inspired the
close-up and came up with the idea of cutting pieces of film to make the story.
The set was
lovely and seemed authentic, as were the costumes. The snippets of black and
white film conveyed both the films made by the characters, but also gave such a
beautiful sense and atmosphere to the whole production.
I said this was
a little play even though in fact it had so much in it! It felt little in that
it was a story of everyday people of the time, in a little village far away
from where main events were happening and where cinema would be born. But this
little story was the conception of something massive.
Travelling Light – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2012
Twitter: @RestrictReview
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)