Showing posts with label Eccleston. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eccleston. Show all posts

Friday, 22 February 2013

SONG FOR MARION - OUT IN UK CINEMAS TODAY

BFI Preview:


Also want to add more thoughts from a second viewing at the BFI:
This time I came away feeling it was an exceptionally poignant film, full of so much 'deep and meaningful' on so many personal (for all of us!) levels with some absolutely gorgeous profound performances in it. This is MUST SEE! It could be a surprise really big hit of 2013! Many others at this preview thought so too. And there were many tears and much laughter from the audience.

Terence Stamp attended the preview. He plays the protagonist Arthur. Asked afterwards about his experience of performing in the film he told us a little story about how he had been trying to find "it" in performance many years ago and since... in Song for Marion he went into each shoot "empty" - then working with, especially Venessa Redgrave and Gemma Arterton, "it" came out of him! It being that feeling/those feelings - that maybe you can't put into words, but are the essence of true acting... of true emotional expression. He went in knowing his lines and with nothing else planned, and came out with total magic committed to celluloid. (He did also say he loved the script on first viewing but didn't think he was ordinary enough to play Arthur!) I haven't seen all his work, but yes what he produced was extremely emotive!

Vanessa Redgrave was also amazing and real. In one scene she sings Cyndi Lauper's 'True Colours' to Terence.
BEAUTIFUL AND INSPIRES GREAT ROMANCE!


LFF Preview:

(Rated 3/5 film/script... 4.5/5 performances.)

I expected Song for Marion to be a comedy along the lines of Rock Choir for OAPs - resembling the level of comedy and song performances of the likes of The Full Monty. I had been entertained by the OAPZ - the choir of elderly people in the film - themselves, for about 5 hours,  as an extra on the film. They were absolutely brilliant in both comedy and musical performance. But the tone of the actual film is somewhat different. There is far more poignancy and somewhat less comedy.
The film follows grumpy pensioner Arthur (Terence Stamp) - addicted to not enjoying himself - and his relationships with his wife Marion (Venessa Redgrave), who is suffering from cancer, and their son James (Christopher Eccleston). Arthur and James are estranged - we are told Arthur was not a good father - whilst the love between Marion and her son is clear and warm. Marion enjoys singing as a member of the OAPZ, who are led by cheery conductor Elizabeth (Gemma Arterton). Arthur refuses to join in and is hostile towards Elizabeth and Marion's other choir friends, even in their support of his wife. The film goes on to explore Arthur's relationship with Elizabeth as she tries to help him 'de-grump' {my word} and find his voice and his heart.
That said Arthur, as played by Terence, clearly has a great heart - just keeps it safely closed, resembling the rock Marion describes him to be.
Vanessa Redgrave is outstanding as ever! She blows me away with her ease of emotional expression and natural ability in character inhabitation. Meanwhile Terence Stamp moved me to tears - both in what he was expressing and what he was holding back. I have never experienced a closed-off, cold character pull so much at my heart strings. I have to say he genuinely did too when I witnessed him singing for the film. My response as an extra was not forced at all! However it seems it ended up on the cutting-room floor. Christopher Eccleston is also very good indeed as a mirror to them both. He IS their son. Only slight flaw is he lost the accent now and then, but otherwise a beautifully reflective portrayal. Gemma Arterton also did very well with what she was given as a character. I did feel, though, her character was the one who most showed up the lacking in the script - it was a little basic compared to the power of the other three. 
Writer/Director Paul Andrew Williams has given us a lovely, sensitive film and I really felt it came from his heart inspired by his own grandparents. For me his writing and direction lack a little in clarity and impact - but his professional actors understood what he wanted to convey and did the job superbly. I just wish there had been a little more of the OAPZ to enjoy, but I will buy the soundtrack and DVD!

Song for Marion – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2012

http://www.facebook.com/TheRestrictedReview
Twitter: @RestrictReview

Saturday, 20 October 2012

Song for Marion - Premiere at the BFI London Film Festival - 19th October 2012


(Rated 3/5 film/script... 4.5/5 performances.)

I expected Song for Marion to be a comedy along the lines of Rock Choir for OAPs - resembling the level of comedy and song performances of the likes of The Full Monty. I had been entertained by the OAPZ - the choir of elderly people in the film - themselves, for about 5 hours,  as an extra on the film. They were absolutely brilliant in both comedy and musical performance. But the tone of the actual film is somewhat different. There is far more poignancy and somewhat less comedy.
The film follows grumpy pensioner Arthur (Terence Stamp) - addicted to not enjoying himself - and his relationships with his wife Marion (Venessa Redgrave), who is suffering from cancer, and their son James (Christopher Eccleston). Arthur and James are estranged - we are told Arthur was not a good father - whilst the love between Marion and her son is clear and warm. Marion enjoys singing as a member of the OAPZ, who are led by cheery conductor Elizabeth (Gemma Arterton). Arthur refuses to join in and is hostile towards Elizabeth and Marion's other choir friends, even in their support of his wife. The film goes on to explore Arthur's relationship with Elizabeth as she tries to help him 'de-grump' {my word} and find his voice and his heart.
That said Arthur, as played by Terence, clearly has a great heart - just keeps it safely closed, resembling the rock Marion describes him to be.
Vanessa Redgrave is outstanding as ever! She blows me away with her ease of emotional expression and natural ability in character inhabitation. Meanwhile Terence Stamp moved me to tears - both in what he was expressing and what he was holding back. I have never experienced a closed-off, cold character pull so much at my heart strings. I have to say he genuinely did too when I witnessed him singing for the film. My response as an extra was not forced at all! However it seems it ended up on the cutting-room floor. Christopher Eccleston is also very good indeed as a mirror to them both. He IS their son. Only slight flaw is he lost the accent now and then, but otherwise a beautifully reflective portrayal. Gemma Arterton also did very well with what she was given as a character. I did feel, though, her character was the one who most showed up the lacking in the script - it was a little basic compared to the power of the other three. 
Writer/Director Paul Andrew Williams has given us a lovely, sensitive film and I really felt it came from his heart inspired by his own grandparents. For me his writing and direction lack a little in clarity and impact - but his professional actors understood what he wanted to convey and did the job superbly. I just wish there had been a little more of the OAPZ to enjoy, but I will buy the soundtrack and DVD!

Song for Marion – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2012


http://www.facebook.com/TheRestrictedReview
Twitter: @RestrictReview

Monday, 1 October 2012

Doctor Matt and The Ponds - a very mini review

Farewell Amy and Rory Pond... the Weeping Angels finally got yas...

(Rated 4/5... on a scale where I'd rate Doctor Chris and Rose at 6/5 and Doctor David and Donna as 7/5.)

This little snippetty review is really just to say something about the relationship developed between The Doctor (Matt Smith), Amy Pond (Karen Gillan) and Rory Williams (Arthur Darvill). For me, amidst all the excitement of monsters, aliens and Sci Fi, the interaction between the Doctor and his companions - how he influences them and vice versa, and each companions particular story - is the most interesting part. I have a big penchant - not nose or chin - for relationships!

I think writer Stephen Moffat has great storytelling skill - he is superb at that - and keeping you on your toes with excitement and Geronimo! ... here we go! But something lacks in emotion between characters and from them. The dialogue is genius and witty in the extreme... totally yowza! And the delivery of that dialogue from all three lacks nothing at all. Oh and have to mention Alex Kingston as River Song too and her contribution in chemistry with The Doctor - charged? yes - highly? no.

The acting is faultless. Every actor brings something different to The Good Doctor - the very best of themselves - and just as Chris Eccleston and David Tennant nailed that - so does Matt Smith. And wonderfully fantastically brilliantly they all look like they could be an alien and give us the majestic, strong yet traumatised doctor from the North, the all-round funny yet high EQ expressive doctor from North of the border and the professor, public school-boy doctor from somewhere a little bit posh ;)

BUT there is an emotional quality that Russell T. Davies and his Whovian team of actors - Billie Piper's Rose Tyler and Catherine Tate's Donna Noble in particular with their respective doctors - gave that, for me, never comes out in the Moffat-lead series. Russell's writing and their performances tore at my heart strings in ways these guys just can't somehow. I was addicted and couldn't get enough. Now I love it but can cope without.

So I do feel sad to see The Ponds go... but not as upset at the loss of Rose... or devastated at the loss of Donna.

The Eleventh Doctor and The Ponds – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2012



Twitter: @RestrictReview

Tuesday, 10 July 2012

‘Blackout’ - BBC1 - Monday 9th July 2012

(Rated 3ish/5)


Okay definitely more range from Chris in episode 2 (please ref back to last post on this). In fact some absolutely beautiful and highly emotive close-ups - stunning emotional expression. BUT, but,I find the dialogue cringe-inducing. What a massive shame. I think alcoholics and their therapists will have gasped in horror at the therapy session! It has an exciting plot now - not sure what is going on any longer - and some very good performances, but sadly the writer has let them down IMO. Maybe all will be much improved for the final episode next week.




Blackout – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2012

Friday, 6 July 2012

‘Blackout’ - BBC1 - Monday 2nd July 2012

(Rated 3ish/5)


I wish Chris Eccleston would be in something properly 'good' again that shows his full talent... something like... Dr Who!! Blackout I found disappointing and predictable, formulaic in plot, dialogue and, sadly, I felt bored. Chris was good as he is at the intense looks... but I so want to see more range!
However, it's only the first episode and may well develop into something great...
More on this here as it develops...


Blackout – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2012

Thursday, 21 June 2012

‘Antigone’ - National Olivier Theatre - Wednesday 20th June 2012


(Rated 4/5 )

This last of my Antigone reviews will be short. Please do check out the others for more information. 
Just wanted to add a few comments on my experience of the performance last night.
The whole thing progressed more quickly - made it feel punchier. That said - for me - the whole play is still too laboured and like a discussion of the same issues over and over again. That's fine, but in a way, lacks dramatic potential in a more emotional sense. The most emotion is felt - and that's significant I guess - from Jamie Ballard as the prophet Teiresias - he cannot see and so he feels, whilst the others see, think and analyse too much.
That said, Jodie Whittaker in her last scene as Antigone - facing death and bemoaning the loss of being a wife and mother - moved me much more than in previous performances. And I really believed Chris Eccleston as the broken man Creon. At last I felt empathy for his plight in the position he is in as a leader doing his best to maintain order in difficult circumstances, how in that position he feels he has to put first what he thinks is best for Thebes, rather than his own family, but at such an enormous personal cost to himself and the lives of those he loves. He is left with nothing. He is nothing. I literally felt empty as he said that.

I know for many it is hard to afford what I am about to write! Thanks to the lower prices of some of London's theatres, such as The National, this can be possible. I LOVE the experience of seeing a play several times during its run. I have seen a progression and development. I've also enjoyed the different choices the actors have made. And I have come to increasingly understand and appreciate the messages of Antigone. Over time The play and characters have come to life and debated with me and the rest of the audience, making me think about many different issues, which the play triggers. And that's how the theatrical experience ought to be. Thanks to all involved!

Antigone – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2012


Twitter: @RestrictReview

Wednesday, 13 June 2012

‘Antigone’ - National Olivier Theatre - Sunday 10th June 2012


(Rated 4/5 )

And now I can genuinely give this production a higher score J (Please see my previous review of opening preview night.) This time I really felt emotions, thought hard with the characters about the issues, arguments and conflicts and felt completely engaged with what was going on. Well done to all! As I said before maybe it wasn’t fair of me to review the very first performance and expect so much, but that said I have seen other previews that certainly affected me much more and were more engaging. This time I felt confident and safely carried along with the drama. Last time I felt highly anxious, willing the cast to do well, but cringing that it wasn’t happening for me.

On this occasion I went with a small group of people. We had a brilliant time during the play and discussing over a meal afterwards. The following incorporates reactions from us all and thank you to my friends for their interesting, insightful and entertaining comments and allowing me to add them to my review.

The theme of this play is tyranny. This time that fully came across – not simply the tyrannical Creon, but also the bullying from Antigone, who in some ways, and in some cultures old and contemporary could be seen as a terrorist herself. Jodie Whittaker as Antigone was less the petulant child she had seemed before, and Christopher Eccleston’s Creon’s internal self-deliberation was visible. Their debates felt like bullets aiming at and hitting their targets even though those targets were not outwardly wounded. Yet I did feel the wounds between father; Creon and son; Haemon as they verbally and physically fought over their views and the condemnation of the Haemon’s betrothed, Antigone. Big shout out goes to Luke Newberry – I was moved by Haemon’s truth and he made impact on his unbending father to the point of Creon having to literally attempt to beat the opposition out of his son, with an effort so strong that he split his shirt open, scattering buttons and revealing his strapped-up chest. Creon-Chris rapidly pulled himself together in a way that felt so much the character rather than the actor trying to protect his dignity. Chris was convincing to the majority of us, to the point of forgetting it was him rather than Creon, though one of us did think “Creon was mediocre”.

Later in the play a messenger, played by Kobna Holdbrook-Smith has to inform Creon’s wife Eurydice – Zoë Aldrich – of her son’s fate. This was such an emotive interaction both by the informer and the mother. It reminded me of several scene-elements in Shakespeare in which one character is giving news of, or experiences of another character that we never see. It obviously disobeys the playwriting rule of show not tell, and yet when the mother’s reaction is this important and this well performed it is a more poignant choice.

Many different choices were made this time in performance, in particular by Chris Eccleston. Even though playing a tense character, he seemed more relaxed and in tune with the process, as were the rest of the cast, maybe taking his lead and all going with the process – still split in their views but more connected in their delivery.

The entire audience seemed to sense the piece on this occasion. Creon got many laughs – some maybe in shock - in particular with his “These women are neurotic”. How familiar is that to many of us, perhaps more so as women, from men who don’t seem to have time for feelings and are in positions where they are obliged to put matters of state or work before family and relationships. Of course it can also reflect differences between men and women in any case in matters of the head or heart. I suppose what was sad and disappointing about this version of the play and what it brought up was there seemed to be little anger, sadness or even indignation from the audience. Antigone and her sister Ismene (Annabel Scholey) are facing death at this point and yet we don’t feel it’s as catastrophic or final as that. This piece almost feels more like a black comedy than a tragedy.

With all the fatalities and Creon’s anguished cry of “I am nothing” at the end, we ‘ought’ to feel how absolutely devastating this all is. But I still did not. And this time I was sitting in a really good seat to see everything. I hate to say it – yes I promise Chris Eccleston remains one of my greatest stage-loves – but at that point I didn’t feel a truly broken man, but someone acting that and in a few minutes he’ll be out of character and smiling at curtain call. And so he did to deservedly enthusiastic applause from the audience. And this time also the actors returned for a second time, led by Christopher and Jodie alone for a few moments, before welcoming back the rest of the cast, with a big smile on Chris’ face as he checks both sides that everyone is together before leading the bows.

I’d like to give – oh gosh this sounds like an acceptance speech and it so isn’t ;) – a final shout out to Michael Grady-Hall, who performs for longest in this production, as he patiently watched the monitor showing the progress of the battle between Antigone’s brothers, and makes notes on what he sees – a reflection of The Lives of Others.

This was for sure “better than staying in with Columbo”.

P.S. At this point in many of my reviews I am giving my experience of the theatre itself – this I have already done with The National Olivier Theatre. But I would like to write a little about Chris himself. And at this point Chris feels more appropriate than Christopher. As you may have gathered from some of my previous Restricted Reviews I enjoy meeting the actors afterwards at the stage door and as themselves – or maybe I should say as much of themselves as they are able to regain having lent much to their character. I have encountered Christopher a few times. Understandably ‘outside’ he has been a little closed off in a kind-of public-persona. I can fully empathise with that. This time, after one of his Antigone performances, I felt I was meeting Chris. He was relaxed, charming, appreciative and funny. He took in comments about the production, thanked us and said he’d pass them on to the rest of the cast. He cheerily joked with myself and a friend about the process of autograph-signing and photo-taking and made sure that everyone got their turn and all they wanted from the experience. A generous, kind-hearted gent!

Antigone – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2012


Twitter: @RestrictReview

Friday, 25 May 2012

‘Antigone’ Preview - National Olivier Theatre - Wednesday 23rd May 2012


(Rated 3/5 )

I absolutely longed to give this production a higher score. I do wonder if I went in with massively high expectations, which simply could not be satisfied. Why so much expectation? Well the play itself is a classic – probably one of the most famous of the Ancient Greek Tragedies – the power and impact of which is enduring as it addresses issues that remain with us today: Conflicts between the state and the individual, dictatorships, authority full of perhaps high IQ but controlling rigidity that will not allow any emotional intelligence through - leading to battles between legal laws and laws of the heart, law in dispute with morality, familial love set against a father or uncle’s need to dominate, male versus female in a society in which the former merits more than the latter… the head versus the heart. And in this particular production one of my favourite actors, whom I have longed to see on stage more – and so has he longed to be ;) – following his many wonderfully powerful screen performances, Christopher Eccleston. I think I have been spoiled by seeing many superb productions in recent times so I have become quite demanding! Or perhaps Ancient Greek Tragedy does not work for me ;).

The plot surrounds an issue of burial. Brothers Eteocles and Polynices, sons of Oedipus and his mother/wife Jocasta, have killed each other in battle. The new King Creon has decreed that Eteocles be respected as a hero, but Polynices condemned as a traitor. This means that the latter cannot be buried. Antigone, sister to both, wishes to bury Polynices. If she does so and is discovered her punishment will be death.

Polly Findlay's production of the play is set in our contemporary time. The male characters are dressed in the main in suits – I was hoping for togas – and Antigone - played by Jodie Whittaker - and sister Ismene – Annabel Scholey – in dresses. The set is a cold/stark/dark room full of offices in which are a multitude of desks, office chairs and numerous staff. It swivels round to reveal an outside wall.

Don Taylor’s play script, adapted from the original by Sophocles, contains numerous orations from both sides of the argument, which to me felt somehow disconnected. I wonder, however, if that was how plays were produced at the time – each actor going to the front of the stage and delivering his part as though in monologue, and then the next had a turn. I don’t mean that the arguments themselves were disengaged or did not follow on from each other, but I felt a lack of connection between the actors. And I honestly can’t put my finger on what wasn’t working for me. Jodie Whittaker did come from the heart. And Christopher Eccleston strongly from the power-crazed Creon – he was believable as a harsh, willful dictator. And I suppose these characters are not supposed to connect so that would make sense. However, I think what was lacking for me is I didn’t feel them really challenging each other. I wanted more! It was as though they were committed to their own sides of the argument, but not to convincing the other person. More pressure and battering needed J. This was a preview – in fact the very first night of previews – so I am sure that will develop. Perhaps on a first night actors are a little careful. I would also say there were a few structural problems in the play itself – again may come from the original author. Numerous supporting cast whom we don’t really get to know – I imagine these are the chorus of Ancient Greek Tragedy. But Creon’s son’s mother is introduced so late in the piece and has only one scene effectively. I missed seeing her relationship with Creon and son. There again, how important was a woman in those days? Antigone herself in fact has a relatively small part considering she is the title role. The main character is Creon and the story is his process and possible transformation. And does he transform? I won’t give the game away. In fact the game wasn’t given away to me either – I was unfortunately in a seat to which Christopher’s back was turned in a crucial scene towards the end so missed the emotion.

There is so much potential in this and I am sure it will be realised as they progress towards the end of the run. I look forward to that J.

Antigone – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2012


Twitter: @RestrictReview

Tuesday, 3 January 2012

‘In The Beginning’ - Westminster Abbey, London - Thursday 24th March 2011 : The more personal and longer version

IN THE BEGINNING THERE WAS IN THE BEGINNING - WHAT FOLLOWS IS THE FIRST RESTRICTED REVIEW WHICH I WROTE. AS SUCH YOU MAY FIND IT RAW AND MORE UNRESTRICTED IN EXPRESSIVENESS! I HELD IT BACK FOR THAT REASON BUT A NEW YEAR A NEW START, WHICH I WOULD LIKE TO BE EVEN MORE OPEN AND SHARING AND ME FULLY ME SO HERE IT IS UNEDITED.



My ‘Public’ View:

(Rated 4/5 )

I calculated that given this 'show' ran for just 3 hours with a new 'performance' every 5 mins and each of those to just 6 people - then only 216 people would get to attend. I felt incredibly privileged to be one of those people in such a beautiful and exciting, historical building lending itself to be a theatre for a show 'starring' arguably the most important book of all time in the setting where it was 'reborn' and where of course so many other extraordinary and exciting historical events have taken place. 

It did indeed feel very special to be there after the abbey is usually closed and to be taken to places in the abbey which so few people get to see. And to be amongst the souls - if you like - of so many awe-inspiring, talented, famous and infamous people, who have passed through before, who are buried there or who are celebrated with memorial plaques. 

We arrived early and it all felt so personal straight away as I gave my name and was later organised into my little group of six by being called by my first name. It was a little bit like a game of musical chairs except all in whispered instructions so that we didn't disturb the performances in action at the time.

When our time came we were taken to meet our guide - an actor - who would lead us through our whole journey through the abbey. Right from the outset we were encouraged to stand close and this incredible intimate experience began! On our little journey - if only it had been longer than 40 minutes - we had various stopping points where we were told some history of that particular area of the abbey and had aspects of the building, statues, tombs etc pointed out. And at each 'stop' we were also treated to a reading from the bible, in 3 cases by our own guide, whilst in others by another actor whom we encountered on our journey waiting patiently, silently at the stop. At the appropriate time, after the little story/ies associated with that part of the abbey had been related by our guide, the waiting actor would open their script and 'perform' their assigned reading. I won't name names but some had more impact than others on me depending on how well they read, how much feeling they put into it, how connected I felt with the perfomer via their eye contact or way of conveying the reading in their voice or slight body movements. In each case we were standing so close to them - maybe just a couple of steps away - that I imagined all of us felt we were having the words spoken just for us. It was such a beautiful, intimate, inclusive, open, connected experience. Naturally the words of each passage in themselves had an impact but for me it was the way they were performed that struck me most. On finishing the reading each actor paused, closed their script, some smiled and we thanked them and they us with a return thank you or inclination of their head or a smile. It was so lovely!

The following were the stops and accompanying readings from the Bible (taken from the 'In The Beginning' souvenir programme):-
High Altar: Revelation 1: 4-18
Quire Screen: Genesis 1: 1-19
The tombs of Newton and Darwin: Genesis 1: 20-31
Unknown Warrior: John 15: 1-14
Amnesty Candle: Micah 6: 1-8
Wilberforce Memorial: Exodus 9: 1-13
Chapel of St John the Baptist: Song of Solomon 2
Edward the Confessor's Tomb: Proverbs 16: 10-24
The Lady Chapel: Luke 8: 40-56
Chapter House: Job 3 and Job 38
Jerusalem Chamber: Ecclesiastes 3: 1-8

Such a brilliant and original way of celebrating two precious 'monuments' of history! Forty-minutes in time I will always treasure.


My ‘Personal’ Experience:

(Rated 4.5/5)

You all know me well enough to know that the very mention of Christopher Eccleston appearing in anything sends me frantically to the internet or telephone to book my ticket to whatever it is and then to get transport to wherever it is come hell or high water! (Haven’t yet sussed out what my geographical limit would be on that or if I have one ;).) And this occasion was almost no exception to that. I say almost because there was much confusion amongst the ‘Ecclesnuts’ – as many of his fans term themselves - as to whether going to this event would be a guarantee that you’d see him perform. Somebody ‘starring’ in a show usually means that all audience members get to see them – unless sadly they damage their backs like David Tennant managed during Hamlet and Love’s Labours Lost for the RSC so missing enough performances in London for him NOT to get nominated for any of the theatrical awards that year – criminal in my humble opinion. Given that each group was being lead around by one of ‘the country's most exciting established or emerging actors’ that would indicate that you wouldn’t be lead round by the others leading other groups – and the readings by an ensemble of performers – would he be amongst those or not?!

Plus I had a pre-arranged ‘date’ with Jonny Lee Miller as The Creature and Beneditch Cumberbatch as Victor Frankenstein at a screening of the National Theatre’s Frankenstein directed by Danny Boyle that same night – another NTLive event. Following excellent public reviews – and a personal one from one of you who knows who they are ;)! – I was very keen to see that. So would I deprive myself from seeing the superbly sensitive, intelligent and interesting interpretation of Frankenstein’s Creature by Jonny or take a risk that I MIGHT get to see Christopher read a bit of the bible to me or even better guide me round Westminster Abbey?!

Okay yes I took the risk on YKW!! BUT I was also highly fortunate that the NT screening was getting repeated on the Saturday and so I got to see it with the very person who has personally recommended it to me. Fantastic! Jonny’s performance was well worth it and Benedict did a great job too though the rest was a bit bland somehow. Anyways…

I arrived at Westminster Abbey several hours – well in fact 4 – early as is my way with these things if I can, giving myself time to suss out where things are and how things work and can I make sure I find my way to all the necessary points – without guidance – for the evening – also giving in to that fear I have of being late so I make sure I’m very early! That said was also meeting a friend in advance – again you know who you are ;) – to have something to eat and catch up before the ‘show’ – so was giving ourselves a good 2 hours for that – and then plenty of time to get back to Abbey so that we’d be there extra early just in case!

So how did the finding things go? Well I’d printed out google map instructions for the necessary journeys – Westminster tube to Westminster Abbey (okay how many of you are laughing at me right now? – yes the abbey is very big and yes you can’t miss it but still I am VERY directionally challenged) – Abbey to restaurant and written down instructions on how to get to the Great North Door which was ‘stage door’ for the night. Well actually the stage door may actually have been the West Door but the North one was our entrance for the night. I found it fine – as confirmed by a man who was waiting there already for his much earlier performance of the show - and sat down to wait a bit, but then thought I should see if I could find the restaurant in advance – you know just in case it took me and friend hours to find?! Oh dear! So I did so and found part of the way – but really I shouldn’t have done that. My lower limbs were already struggling a bit – from disability and I was predicting they might get even worse from nervous excitement later - and I knew we’d have 40 minutes walk around the Abbey.

Time passed…

Had a lovely meal but I couldn’t eat very much – ‘Ecclesangst’ had started to hit – and I was also starting to struggle to be fully present.

We got back to the Abbey and you already know part of the story now from my ‘public’ view.

So I will now tell you the parts that feel far more personal to me J

Our group’s guide was a young lady called Morven Christe:

I liked her as a guide and as a person. She was a sweetie - played her role well - was considerate - enthusiastic - knowledgeable beyond the text she had in her arms and she created interest and enjoyment. Not that what we were seeing and hearing wasn’t those things in any case but she added to it for me. I believed her! One of the crucial aspects for a performance to work J

Incidentally the text I refer to was the ‘play’ as written by Nick Payne with extracts from the KJV. We were given a copy at the end, which was a good job given my increasing lack of presence due to pain – legs really struggled even with use of stick etc – and anxiety/excitement about whether Christopher would appear at each next ‘stop’ – the longer it went on the harder it was for me to go on but I did and I’m so pleased I did! Morven did ask me a few times if I was okay and if she could help me up stairs etc. I replied I was fine with the banisters and then had friend help me at points when there weren’t any! It’s funny – as many of you know I am usually kind of anxious before a performance – I get nervous for the actors as well as myself in a strange way! – but usually I know I’ll be fine as I’m sitting in a theatre seat and all I have to do is watch and listen. This was very different!

Back to the text – it contained the history and stories associated with each stop we had and then the carefully selected – by The Revd Dr James Hawkey – readings from the Bible.
We started at The High Altar where all sovereigns since 1066 have been crowned and in front of which is the Cosmati pavement, on which is depicted the entire history of the Universe including its date of demise – happily maybe that has eroded away! We had to be very careful to stand on the top stair up to the altar but not on the pavement itself and I was a little anxious I might fall backwards – not trusting my balance these days! Morven read the first reading to us; Revelation 1:4-18.
Michelle Terry’s reading from John 15: 1-14 by the tomb of the unknown soldier was watery-eye inducing. Sharon Small’s sparkling reading of the title piece from Genesis matched The Quire Screen,  with its little archway with stars on the ceiling.

We had Andrew Woodall by the tombs of Newton and Darwin. I stood on Newton’s tomb and then started moving off it when Morven pointed it out but she said it was fine – he wouldn’t mind! Andrew’s performance was very good – he maintained excellent eye contact while continuing to read and stayed ‘in character’ throughout. For other readings we had Jamie Ballard, Jonathan Coy and we think Emmy Sainsbury.

Building towards my personal highlight of the night we had Morven and Nonso Anozie perform Job 3 and Job 38 with Morven as Job and Nonso as the LORD! For me kind of a sexy, scary God! This performance was in the Chapter House, billed as one of the most ‘acoustically rousing and thrilling locations’ in the whole abbey. It certainly was and we experienced their voices echo all around us in the deliverence of such powerful verse on humanity and complexity and why we suffer. Highly memorable! Nonso’s voice and himself – so much so that I recognised him on the tube two days later – I think I looked at him a little too long in making sure it was him – he turned away! Hope I didn’t scare him back!

Somewhere along the tour we had to wait a while as the group in front had not finished. At the time we were near many memorial plaques, including one to Jane Austen amongst many, many other well-knowns. Another guide teased Morven about Austen being her favourite author. At the time I didn’t realise why but googling her afterwards she played Jane Bennet in Lost in Austen.

In the Lady Chapel we heard another beautiful reading from Luke’s Gospel about Jesus’ compassion for women. Unfortunately I am not sure who read that! May have been Emmy Sainsbury or Miranda Raison. Very lovely in any case!

And then in the Chapel of St John the Baptist Tamsin Greig was the performer patiently waiting for us. She told us she was going to read us a love poem and that she wouldn’t make eye contact. I think the latter was a joke – and perhaps aimed at the men in our group. During her excellent, emotive and expressive reading of Song of Solomon 2 I kept my eyes on her and we had several moments of eye contact with kind of a cheeky glint in those eyes at points!  I really enjoyed her reading and felt very connected to the words and to her.

And so on we went past tombs of monarchs such as Henry V and Edward The Confessor, and many different chapels all decorated differently and all awe inspiring in their own ways. And the incredible magnificence of the whole building! It felt marvelous to be in there… and at times pretty cold too!

We were almost at the end of the tour… I was still hopeful that maybe HE would be the climax…

Morven took us into the Jerusalem Chamber, where the final edit of the King James Bible took place and in which a group of fifty or more scholars assembled and read their whole bible aloud from start to finish before its publication.

As she was telling us this we thought we heard the voice of a man outside the door…

Morven read Ecclesiastes 3: 1-8 to us:
“ To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under heaven…”

…and that was the end of the tour…

Not my season for Christopher Eccleston on this occasion and not the time to fulfill my next purpose with him! ;) ;)

The End of the Word.

Afterword: I am extremely pleased that a desire to experience an intimate performance by my favourite actor – oh my goodness the eye contact! - lead me to this extraordinary theatrical endeavour and even though I was in physical agony afterwards - so much that I could hardly walk back to mine - and was experiencing disappointment, I was blown away by a kind of spiritual power and exchange with those performers and the words of that text in that abbey that - even though I don’t believe in the Christian God as such - felt like a celebration of what I consider as my God of deep, connected, expressive humanity and theatrical performance!

In The Beginning – Review by The Restricted Reviewer © 2011  


Twitter: @RestrictReview

Tuesday, 21 June 2011

‘The Shadow Line’ - Broadcast by BBC2 - Thursday 5th May -Thursday 16th June 2011

Some shows are easy to watch even if you are a restricted viewer. They are shown on television and all you need do is park yourself on your sofa, with a cuppa perhaps, and a bite to eat, and enjoy the view on the small(ish) silver screen in front of you.

Mind you, if the show is The Shadow Line, it might be wise to take great care when you choose to sip your tea, and like many of the characters you may not even have a chance to take that bite to eat, before a shocking moment descends on you. Happily in the viewer’s case the result is probably not death. For the characters there’s a high chance it might be!

This is a compelling and bizarre thriller with a vast multitude of thrilling moments in addition to very many hysterically funny moments also, some intended by the writer, (producer and director), Hugo Blick and others possibly unintentional. For me the greatest comedy was provided by Rafe Spall as baby-faced psychopath Jay Wratten, nephew of drug baron Harvey Wratten, whose murder sets the whole story and investigation by both criminals and police off. Jay was terrifying and funny at the same time, delivering lines, such as that accusing a fellow character of comitting a ‘naughty tackle’, superbly and later telling the story of a sportsman inviting people to ‘shoot him’ if he returned to his sport. Jay announces if the man had said that to him he would have shot him. And we know he would and with glee, and what that also means for anyone who does not leave his ‘sport’ when they have said they would. In a scene chasing another character his running gait provides some moments of light relief in the midst of high tension. He loves to torture; beware all humans and cats! The moment he, or Stephen Rea’s mysterious Gatehouse, appear on screen we feel very wary. That said Gatehouse is far less obvious as someone of whom to be afraid; he is still, monotone and in perfect control. He seeems like he may actually help the other characters. In first meeting him you wonder whether you can actually fully trust this man in raincoat, black gloves and trilby hat informing you, ‘What I am about to tell you will be the most important thing you will ever hear.’ But why? Well if I said any more it’d spoil the surprise(s) wouldn’t it?!

The direction, photography and acting by all are excellent. You could take still images and they would feel like works of art set in the shadow between light and dark – Leonardo DaVinci would have loved it! And the direction gives plenty of time to focus on each actor as they explore the depth of their character and his/her feelings in outstanding psychological studies. This is especially important in the stories of Detective Inspector Jonah Gabriel played by Chiwetel Ejiofor and ‘flower-man’ Joseph Bede – Christopher Eccleston. Whilst trying to solve the crime, Jonah is also trying to solve the mystery of who he is, suffering amnesia as the result of a bullet in his head. Is he ‘good cop’ or ‘bad cop’? The great sensitivity of his emotional expression has us feeling for him and yet not knowing if we are ‘right’ to – our doubts reflecting his own. His work partner Lia Honey (very nicely played by Kierston Wareing) tells him that he is a good cop because ‘it goes with the badge’ but that doesn’t feel very convincing or reassuring. The difficulty with these two characters is we don’t really get to know them. Chiwetel does an excellent job expressing what he can but of course holds back because he doesn’t know exactly who he is! And Honey comes across as a very efficient and dedicated, though a  little naïve, cop but also a highly expositional character. This is also the trouble with the script at many points. Some of the characters are given very long-winded expositional monologues/dialogues to take the plot forward and yet we cannot engage enough to understand it. At points it tries to be too clever; too over-the-top for what actually needs to be conveyed. And when, following probably the longest expositional scene by a character in the whole piece, that same character decides to put a gun in his mouth instead of a cup of tea we completely sympathise! That said, even with its vast array of characters – probably too many to follow and some seemingly uneccessary, we do feel a great deal of empathy for many of them even some more minor characters.
The character who most inspires our empathy though is the ‘main’ criminal character Joseph Bede, who has felt obliged to take over the drugs operation from his murdered boss Harvey Wratten. Played softly and subtly by Christopher Eccleston, he seems so gentle and hardly a cold, calculating criminal. He is all about surviving and making enough money in a final drugs deal to support himself and his wife Julie – Leslie Sharp – to the end of their days. The tragedy is the end of their days together may be much sooner than for others in their mid-forties. Julie suffers with early-onset alzheimers. Arguably Lesley’s performance in this is the most impressive of all – it is certainly the most heart-rending. Joseph and Julie were childhood sweethearts and we will for him to have his final deal succeed so at least they can have the care required to make the best of the few remaining precious real moments her illness allows them together.

So who did kill Harvey Wratten and why does it matter so much to the 70 characters involved? What is The Shadow Line really about? Is is simply asking us to think about the ethics and moral of human behaviour and how there is no black and white but rather we are all good and bad? Or is there something much greater at stake?
For that you will have to watch for yourselves and hope to understand – it is not easy!

Or you can read below for a few clues and resolutions…




** WARNING: THE FOLLOWING CONTAINS SOME SPOILERS**




The answer to the who-dunnit comes surprisingly early in episode 3 when we learn it is Gatehouse. In fact this seems too simple and obvious and has you asking yourself if that was really the case and what more is there to discover? Of course, in spite of the fact that Gatehouse is murdering people right, left and centre and did kill Harvey Wratten, there is more to it! And that is one of the reasons we remain hooked. We so want to know what as well as follow Jonah’s journey of self-discovery and find out if Joseph can find a miracle to help him and Julie!

The what was beautifully summarised in a text from someone near and dear to me:
“I only understood what was going on just before the end. I don’t quite see how this system {pension ‘scheme’} can be viable considering the numbers of murders necessary each time someone steps out of line! Emotionally harrowing though…”

And yes it really is that!
Joseph’s deal does not succeed in time to make a better life for him and Julie with care in their own home. And as he has not left the ‘game’ in adequate time to satisfy Jay Wratten, he knows he intends to kill him. Desperately sad and with Julie trying to kill herself to stop the pain and begging him to let her go, Joseph commits sucide himself allowing Jay to kill him in the same manner as Harvey Wratten was killed at the beginning.
And just as Jonah has found out that he is in fact a good cop and now tries to stop the bad cops he also gets killed by his own partner Honey! This is awful – the good hero dies – thinking at the end of the scan of his new baby still inside his wife’s womb.

Unusually bad has won over good and we are left with bad guys Jay Wratten and Gatehouse and bent cops taking care of the continuing pension scheme!


The Shadow Line – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2011


http://www.facebook.com/TheRestrictedReview
Twitter: @RestrictReview