Showing posts with label Tennant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tennant. Show all posts

Monday, 27 January 2014

‘Richard II’ - Barbican Centre - Saturday 25th January 2014 – Final Performance

(Rated 5/5 )

And so yes – believe it or not but given how I am with seeing plays etc at least twice I’m sure you can believe it – I went again and for the final night to see R2-DT and cast perform their last. Do I detect an influence of Shakespeare’s lyricism upon me?! ;) Well be it so as the lyricism of the text was far more evident than the first time I heard it in this production J And how did they perform? Well this time they merited that elusive extra point to make it the perfect – though I have given even higher scores! – 5 out of 5! Full energy was imparted by all making it engaging in the extreme. It’s fascinating though as I think my not receiving it so well last time is actually as much to do with me as them. I don’t think I judged fairly being put off by the brilliance of previous R2s and somehow unwilling to like it as much or more. Plus my internal Shakespeare-translator wasn’t functioning properly perhaps – I did struggle to understand it, even though I had of course seen those other versions. Well whatever it was – improved delivery or improved reception – I was fully attentive and engaged the whole way through and felt I understood everything. I do still stand by what I said before – all productions I have seen are excellent and offering different things and/but if I was pressed to put the R2s in order DT would come an extremely close second to Ben, but really I think they’re equally as ‘good’ whatever that means ;) I do think DT at his best almost can’t fail to win the hardest of hearts or impress almost anyone. It almost doesn’t matter what part he is playing he will give a performance so much full of life it’s not performing – he is being in front of us even if veiled by whatever mask needs wearing as his character. I didn’t forget it was DT this time but fully believed this was Richard II without any silliness about an accent putting me off ;) And this time ‘This Sceptered Isle’ gave me goosebumps – even though it wasn’t at all cold upstairs in the ‘Gods’ – so beautiful!! And I was really struck too by what a truly great actor Oliver Ford-Davies is! The poor Duke of York really does have such a struggle through the whole thing – seeing full well what a mess is being created and how Richard and his own son have done wrong and yet what should be done legally and loyally?! What is right?! I found Bolingbroke improved on me too. And everyone else on fire also – the crème de la crème of performance!
It seemed the rest of the audience also received this play as it is meant to be received – all reactions appropriate to the moments that triggered them – be they of comedy or tragedy. It seems everyone was equally in it as it should be.
And when the performers finally reached the end of the play and DT lead the curtain calls it felt as though we were all really in it together too actors and audience – so much so the audience wouldn’t let the actors go. The last time I saw this there were just two curtain calls – this time we carried on applauding after they’d left the second and were rewarded by DT coming back on and gesturing for the other actors to join him once more. And still we wouldn’t stop. So they applauded us with absolutely massive smiles on their faces. They then stopped, and we still did not, though DT attempted to stop us with a gesture of his hands to desist. Finally, when that was to no avail, out came that wittily delivered yet firm instruction in his own tongue ‘Go home!’ and we obeyed J Thou art adorable, Mr DT!


Barbican – still nice theatre but upstairs not too cold and actor’s faces discernible even without opera glasses but even better with J !!!

Richard II (“R2-DT”) – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2014

Monday, 20 January 2014

‘Richard II’ - Barbican Centre - Thursday 16th January 2014

(Rated 4/5 )

I told my friends/fellow theatre-goers that David Tennant had a lot of work to do to impress me as Richard II. I was joking in some ways – so confident in “DT” and his abilities as he has never disappointed me - but having seen two previous very good performances of “R2” by Eddie Redmayne and Ben Whishaw and been exceptionally impressed by the latter, who embodied him so perfectly and sensitively, I was doubtful as to whether DT could match or even top that. I was also excited to give him that challenge – though of course the man himself knew nothing about it ;). So who and how was “R2-DT” as he has become affectionately known to us ever since we first heard that David was going to undertake this Richard? Well not an immediate hit with me. I was a little put off by his accent (my issue with posh accents that are not the actor’s own ;)) and, as one of my friends said, he doesn’t get much to do for some time in this production of the play. Of course that is the text itself, but The Donmar’s production had Eddie sitting on the throne as the audience took their seats giving us time to kind of bond with him. R2-DT does not appear for some time. His transformation includes long wavy hair extensions and black mascara – he is slim elegant and beautiful – and he convincingly plays the vanity, narcissism and materialistic attitudes of Richard II. This Richard is not so much young – well DT is a little bit older – but his youthfulness comes from a strong yet subtle femininity that DT gives him. As you see him next to his Queen, played very nicely indeed by RSC newcomer Emma Hamilton, they are two lovely royal feminine creatures. I felt really drawn to his Queen – pun very much intended as DT does give his Richard an element of gay man far be it from a drag version – with whom I could connect more than Eddie or Ben’s Queens. Michael Pennington has the exciting task of playing John of Gaunt and so delivering probably the most anticipated speech in this play, ‘This Sceptered Isle’. His version, while not losing any of the lilting poetry, still comes across as sort of matter-of-fact – he might have said ‘This is England and I love it and that’s that’. ;). Oliver Ford-Davies appears again alongside DT – having played Polonius to his Hamlet – his interaction with John of Gaunt is good attentive listener, but he shines later in the humour of his part of the Duke of York, both bumbling, indignant, fickle and despairing as to the events around him brought about by his nearest and supposedly dearest. Marty Cruickshank and Jane Lapotaire, as the Duchesses of York and Gloucester respectively, were delightful. I also really took to Greene and Bushy – Marcus Griffiths and Sam Marks – not large parts but they made their presences felt, but not so much to Nigel Lindsay’s Henry Bolingbroke. I guess if you grow sympathetic to Richard, you’re going to turn against Henry, though I somehow didn’t feel as much as I’d want from him as a character – indifference isn’t so good. R2-DT gradually made his way into my heart – by the end of the performance I was kissing my friend next to me in delight!
The design, courtesy of Stephen Brimson Lewis, was very clever – strings of metal onto which the scenery itself was projected, including as an opener the interior of Westminster Abbey. The projections changed through the play and I forgot they were there. I recall really noticing the lyricism of Shakespeare’s words when delivered in the production at the Donmar. Part way through this I suddenly remembered that, but somehow it seemed lost in this production. The focus seemed more on conveying it as more natural speech.
I suppose it is a very obvious thing to say both how different productions can come across in such different ways but also show the audience something/s completely new about the characters, the story; in this case the history. It’s all in the interpretation, and even in a character so ‘set’ somehow, as you might expect real-life King Richard II to be, as opposed to a character like Hamlet who can be literally anything the actor wishes to give him, the actor can give us very refreshingly new aspects of who he might have been. I think that is especially true for Shakespeare’s plays – ‘remakes’ can keep on coming, whilst for other plays – screen or stage – you may sometimes think – what is the point when you’ve already seen a good version! Here is so much depth in all he wrote and on each reworking, on each performance of the same reworking, ever more truth about the human condition and new insights emerge. “R2-DT” is also very opposite to the image you may get if you think of the little blue droid his nick-name is based on. As is his way he gives so much feeling to everyone he embodies making his character leap out and grab the audience’s empathy. He is extra-ordinary with the emphasis on that extra. As to be expected some of the audience wanted to clasp at and laugh out loud in response to the tiny nuggets of humour there are in the play, especially when coming from DT, which was a shame as at times their loud ‘guffaws’ - more suited to a comedy - took away from the poignancy of performance. This is probably the farthest away DT has been in performance from his regeneration of The Doctor. Shakespeare is not even remotely alien to him – this is DT beauty-fully at home.

Barbican – nice theatre but too cold!!!


Richard II (“R2-DT”) – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2014

Wednesday, 24 April 2013

Broadchurch ITV Closure 22nd April 2013


(Rated 5/5)

Broadchurch will return... but should it?! Now we know who killed Danny do we really need anything more? Series one had all the ingredients of a truly cracking whodunnit and suitably traumatised lead investigators with mysterious pasts - well in fact who did not have a mysterious past on the show?! - but to me it felt like an extremely good but self-contained piece. When something is that good should it really be repeated or stop when the going's good. Then again The Killing and other shows have successfully done it. I just hope it does not get over-milked. The acting was truly superb from everyone - I was particularly moved by Pauline Quirke's performance during her revelatory story... and then later Olivia Coleman in response to the final awful resolution. David Tennant was brilliant at stepping into a fully-rounded, damaged and flawed slightly cruel; later sympathetic character - even though I struggled for just a while with "DT is always nice DT deep-down really and that's it" - goodness knows how I will respond to him in The Politician's Husband when he will apparently be truly not nice! Arthur Darvill also did very well in a non-RoryPond role as the supportive yet challenging vicar... and Jodie Whittaker truly heartbreakingly wonderful as Danny's mother. The linking theme is abuse and love of children - where the two may even meet and the rights and wrongs of that - very emotive and powerful.
Broadchurch – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2013

http://www.facebook.com/TheRestrictedReview
Twitter: @RestrictReview



Monday, 1 October 2012

Doctor Matt and The Ponds - a very mini review

Farewell Amy and Rory Pond... the Weeping Angels finally got yas...

(Rated 4/5... on a scale where I'd rate Doctor Chris and Rose at 6/5 and Doctor David and Donna as 7/5.)

This little snippetty review is really just to say something about the relationship developed between The Doctor (Matt Smith), Amy Pond (Karen Gillan) and Rory Williams (Arthur Darvill). For me, amidst all the excitement of monsters, aliens and Sci Fi, the interaction between the Doctor and his companions - how he influences them and vice versa, and each companions particular story - is the most interesting part. I have a big penchant - not nose or chin - for relationships!

I think writer Stephen Moffat has great storytelling skill - he is superb at that - and keeping you on your toes with excitement and Geronimo! ... here we go! But something lacks in emotion between characters and from them. The dialogue is genius and witty in the extreme... totally yowza! And the delivery of that dialogue from all three lacks nothing at all. Oh and have to mention Alex Kingston as River Song too and her contribution in chemistry with The Doctor - charged? yes - highly? no.

The acting is faultless. Every actor brings something different to The Good Doctor - the very best of themselves - and just as Chris Eccleston and David Tennant nailed that - so does Matt Smith. And wonderfully fantastically brilliantly they all look like they could be an alien and give us the majestic, strong yet traumatised doctor from the North, the all-round funny yet high EQ expressive doctor from North of the border and the professor, public school-boy doctor from somewhere a little bit posh ;)

BUT there is an emotional quality that Russell T. Davies and his Whovian team of actors - Billie Piper's Rose Tyler and Catherine Tate's Donna Noble in particular with their respective doctors - gave that, for me, never comes out in the Moffat-lead series. Russell's writing and their performances tore at my heart strings in ways these guys just can't somehow. I was addicted and couldn't get enough. Now I love it but can cope without.

So I do feel sad to see The Ponds go... but not as upset at the loss of Rose... or devastated at the loss of Donna.

The Eleventh Doctor and The Ponds – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2012



Twitter: @RestrictReview

Tuesday, 26 June 2012

‘True Love’ - BBC - started Sunday 17th June 2012


(Rated 3/5)

This was a great idea - some of the UK's top actors - David Tennant, David Morrissey, Jane Horrocks, Lacey Turner, Vicky McClure, Billie Piper - improvising their way through stories of love - and in some cases it worked beautifully and naturally - but there was also some highly cliched and cringe-inducing lines and less than good acting. I felt things improved as the series went on - David Morrissey's being the most impressive and unpredictable. Jane Horrocks' episode was also moving to me - though sadly I felt Charlie Creed Miles let the side down as her husband, who seemed unable to portray feeling. Lacey Turner showed us again that she is stunning at being traumatised. Billie Piper came across very girly but was touching in her lesbian love story. I did want and expect better from others though. Long live WRITERS! :)

True Love – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2012


http://www.facebook.com/TheRestrictedReview
Twitter: @RestrictReview

Thursday, 2 June 2011

Much Ado About Nothing - Wyndhams Theatre - 26th May 2011

(Rated 7/5 ) 

Please note for those who do not know the play or want to be surprised by the production, this review contains spoilers.


This was actually Much Ado About Something Totally Amazing!
Rated 7/5 as it is definitely better than perfection and 7 is my favourite number!
A spectacle triggered and catalyzed by the special connection between Catherine Tate, and David Tennant and definitely enhanced by their glorious skills in comedy drama making them an electric pairing of acting talent – in my humble opinion, best comedy couple ever!
And, yes I cannot resist, in the words of David Tennant’s alter-ego the 10th Doctor, as if speaking to all performers/companions involved, ‘You were brilliant, and so were you, and you…’ Gulps!

From now on I will refer to David Tennant as DT, (as he is affectionately called by many), and Catherine Tate as CT.

I first heard about this on Saturday 8th January 2011, in a text from a very good friend, with whom I’ve shared some previous superb DT performance viewings on stage in Hamlet and Love’s Labours Lost. I was in the bath at the time! The text read that DT and CT would be on BBC Breakfast. So I rushed out of the bath and put the TV on. That was around 8am so a bit of a wait to the end of the programme when they came on, just before 10am. DT said to CT: ‘You tell them.’ And so she did; they’d be doing Much Ado About Nothing together with her as Beatrice and him as Benedick. It had been CT’s idea to do it, but some time ago, and she thought too close to their time on Doctor Who and so they waited a while before running it by a producer, Sonia Friedman. CT added she thought DT would be the perfect Benedick. Later he said he thought she the perfect Beatrice. Russell T. Davies comments in his book, Doctor Who: The Writer’s Tale that DT and CT adore each other. Their on-screen chemistry is clear to all who have seen their stint together in the TARDIS during the fourth series of the new Doctor Who (DW). Though DT is not ‘My Doctor’ as Whovians term their favourite DW title-role playing actor, he and CT are my favourite Doctor-Companion combination. They spark off each other! Their joy and emotion hits you full on! And personally I love the concept of two best buddies working together for the entertainment of themselves and so for others too. That way we/the audience, get to experience their best work.
The moment the interview finished I was on the internet to book tickets - any tickets that could be obtained. Well, except they couldn’t be for love nor money. Not for the next 3 hours. The website was continually down and nobody answered the box office phone. I guess maybe a few others were trying too! I persisted, absolutely determined, and at the 11th hour – so to speak (just as I had to go out); not a reference to Matt Smith honest – I was rewarded by the website finally allowing me to get two tickets. In actual fact I wasn’t quite sure when I’d got them for. By this point the website was live and working but in a kind of sporadic way that meant you could get so far before it hung up and you lost what you’d been doing. As it turned out they were tickets to a preview show. In theory the actors and whole performance improves during the run until the end when they’re so at ease with it, the flow is as perfect as it’s ever going to be. I imagine during some runs there are performances in the middle that may feel a little less good if the actors fall into the trap of roboticness and not feeling a new zest for it every performance. That said there is something very exciting about previews. The actors and team are still experimenting; trying out new things, and for me any mistakes are actually exciting opportunities, endearing, potentially exposing of some personal quality of that actor and not ‘wrong’.

On the day I felt the usual pre-performance nerves that I experience for the actors and for me. I trust them more than I do myself. Of course they’re gonna do great and have it all in hand – head and heart too – but maybe my psychology is someone has to be nervous so I’ll do it for them.

I arrived early – as is my way – but this time, joy of joys, no need for a google map or directions. If you do check google – which of course I did! – Wyndham’s theatre sits on top of Leicester Square tube. Geographically it is right next door. And of course there is a huge picture of DT and CT for all to see from afar so you absolutely can’t miss it/them. I had also checked out the location with a friend the previous Saturday and we’d also sussed out the ‘stage door’ situation – ‘stage dooring’ now being a necessary part of the complete theatrical experience for me. I love meeting the actors afterwards as themselves and doing the autograph/photo thing - lovely little interactions.
I sat in the theatre foyer waiting for a friend. (We were going to meet at the stage door but it was raining hard.) Already there were some quite scruffy-looking men, being organised by a smart-casually dressed woman. They seemed to have camera equipment and the woman was handing out notes. Press! It was press night. My friend arrived and then a man from below who informed everyone that there was another 7 minutes to wait as ‘Catherine was having her hair and make-up completed.’ OH how I’d have loved to gate-crash that press Q&A. Could’ve invented a fictional magazine/periodical that I was writing for. Well actually I am! But of course the organising woman had names and was counting heads on the way in so missed that gig!

Friend and I went to eat. We planned to go to a place about 5 minutes away but it rained so hard on the way that we dove into the nearest restaurant, which happened to be a Bella Italia, but could have been anything really! Later, unfortunately, I texted other friends that we were in Bella Pasta, causing a great deal of confusion in meeting up since there are no Bella Pastas on Leicester Square but, is I found out from one poor friend trying to find us, 3 Bella Italias!

Having rescued friend, and finished our meal, we made our way back to the theatre. We still had plenty of time and so decided to go for another stage door reccy. It was still there but quite neglected. We joked we’d have good spots if we stayed and didn’t bother watching the performance. Very different to the previous Saturday around 5:15pm when it was crowded with people waiting for the stars. On that occasion a couple walked past wondering if ‘it’ was Christopher Eccleston, whom everyone was waiting for. As DT came out, and I managed to get a good enough view, I commented, ‘He has stubble’. A passing man asked if that was good. I replied in the affirmative; certainly very good on most men to look at and if not too long and prickly to kiss too.

We collected two more friends at the front of the theatre and, seeing as we were all sitting in different places, agreed to meet for a just a few minutes afterwards – in my head the few minutes would extend to as long as it took DT and CT to come out – back at the stage door.

On the way to my seat I bought goodies. I had just planned to get a programme – as souvenir, for cast/crew information and to be signed by DT&CT – and a poster – to put up on wall. Then I spotted a T-shirt was available too. I unashamedly admit that, like DT, I enjoy wearing T-shirts – black best – on which are my favourite performers and/or something they have drawn, eg. DT and his doodle for Headway Essex.  So T-shirt was very tempting but a dilemma due to cost and being financially challenged. In the end, as friend said, I’d be getting them all anyway so I might as well do it now. I did and clutched them all lovingly and obsessively to my chest as I struggling past others to my seat. A fab seat! Central in 3rd row stalls.


The play commenced with Hero (Sarah Macrae) dancing to a recognisable, but disguised 80s track, ‘played’ by a ghetto-blaster. And so the party, the theme and setting of the play are well and entertainingly established. According to the programme we are in Gibraltar and many of the male members of the cast, including Benedick and Claudio have come back from the Falklands war. All the music is 80s-inspired or adapted; so too, the costumes and hair. Maria’s young son, who has some highly amusing interactions with DT’s Benedick, comes on stage with a Rubik’s cube. CT’s Beatrice first appears dressed as a Blues Brother. And later DT’s Benedick redresses for the fancy dress party in highly colourful lace tights and top, denim mini-skirt and a curly fair-haired wig; Madonna?! Claudio comes as Adam Ant and Hero wears a Lady Diana mask and later her wedding dress. But I am jumping way ahead of myself and the play…

DT in fact first arrives on stage at the wheel of a golf-buggy to resounding cheers from the audience. Incidentally DT has said that this bit of ‘business’ will not continue for the whole run. What a shame; it was wonderfully hilarious seeing him do a 3-point turn to drive the buggy off stage again.

Benedick is talking with other characters, when Beatrice baits him, beginning the first of many rounds of comedic insulting banter by asking him why he is talking as nobody is listening to him. He retorts with the famous line;
"What, my dear Lady Disdain! are you yet living?"
She replies wondering how such disdain could die, with Beneck there to feed it.
And so the current state of their relationship is simply yet beautifully and effectively set-up by the master writer William Shakespeare; probably at his best comedically in this play. This is a classic situation of two people meant to be together yet constantly resisting their attraction. A meeting of minds and wit but determined to hate each other. The one set in his ways and content as he is with no need for a female love-interest/companion; the other as scornful of men as she is of marriage.
This seems designed for the skills of DT and CT. They play it marvellously, jumping off each other’s lines with their own in perfect timing, pitch and with a sense that they are absolutely in tune being out of tune. Interestingly, these two are playing this at ages 43 (her) and 40 (him). A time when single people these days may feel ‘on the shelf’ with no hope of getting off it, which would almost certainly have been the case/feeling in Shakespeare’s time. Many of us teenagers of the 80s can identify!

We are also introduced to Hero’s story. Claudio (Tom Bateman) is told that the Prince, Don Pedro (Adam James) plans to woo Hero for him. Claudio is suspicious that the prince actually plans to woo her for himself, unware that it is the bastard brother Don John (Elliot Levey) of whom he should be wary. As villain of the piece Don John plots to convince Claudio that Hero has been unfaithful and so ruining her for marriage. This is in fact the main plot of the play and the thread on which all else hangs, and yet it feels like it is there only to serve the drama of Beatrice and Benedick’s relationship.

We return to B&B as, set on getting them together, other characters amuse themselves, and us, by attempting to convince each one that the other is in love with them. The staging of this is total genius. Whilst the men discuss how much Beatrice loves Benedick, pillars revolve around the stage, at times just revealing enough and yet plenty of the hidden – or so he thinks – Benedick and his reactions to what they are saying. Meanwhile the blinds are being white-washed by painters. DT encounters many obstacles and has numerous accidents whilst trying to keep hidden while still hearing what’s going on. At one point he falls so that his hand gets covered in paint, which he later forgets and wipes over his face and hair. Of course we know, though he doesn’t, that not only do the conspirators know he is there but he is being highly unsuccessful in covering his accidents. Benedick’s facial expressions are classic DT! This is fall-out-of-your seat hysterically funny.
Beatrice is sent to call Benedick to dinner. The physical state he is now in begs all her disdain! He now feels for her supposed predicament and has decided to requite her love… but not yet. We experience the humour of their kind of transition state – her just as she was and he altered.

And then it is Beatrice’s turn to be set-up. This time one of the painters is on a pulley-system as he paints a pillar. Hero and Ursula (Kathryn Hunt) start talking about Benedick’s supposed infatuation and Beatrice tries to hide from them. In her case she crawls under a paint-spattered sheet. Her conspirators proceed to hook her up to the pulley and she is raised from under the sheet so she can look and listen from on high, whilst still believing she is hiding! Again there is phenomenal comedy from CT’s facial expressions and body language; and so much laughter that we can hardly hear the dialogue below her. We are provided with another wonderful and typical CT moment as, back down to earth, she unhooks herself and shows us how proud she is of her high-flying feats! All credit to CT doing that 8 performances per week in the 3-month run. I believe 101 times in all!

The acting by all is superb. There are no hangers on. They have the excellent text of Shakespeare to work on and sell it in spades.

The comedy continues to excel in the hands on the watchmen who witness talk regarding the dastardly deed of usual Shakespearean mistaken identity in which Hero, really Margaret (Natalie Thomas) is taken to have ‘spoken’ with Borachio (Alex Beckett) at her hen party. But otherwise the tone of the piece changes to a painful seriousness as the consequences of the deception play out.

The interval comes as Beatrice is getting drunk on the hen night as she struggles with her love for Benedick and fretting about how he will repond to her having decided to requite him.

Then in Act 2, Hero is preparing for her wedding in Lady Di gown and Beatrice, unprepared, has a hang-over! She curls up in Hero’s train.

B&B believe themselves in love but have not yet come out to each other. We see all the feelings that we can so identify with and feel for them in; the awkwardness, the vulnerability, the looks of love, the avoidances and again all superbly acted by CT and DT.

We then have the drama of Hero’s wedding in which Claudio refuses to marry Hero, accusing her of being ‘false’.  Beatrice is upset; distraught for her cousin, Benedick is all concern. This is again finely played, especially by CT revealing the heart of Beatrice and love for her cousin. A revenge plot is hatched to convince Claudio and others that Hero died from the shock and he is obliged to marry her ‘cousin’.

B&B are left alone. With a gulp, Benedick confesses his love to Beatrice. She laughs. This is such a huge ‘Aaww’ moment that I found myself expressing it out loud on several occasions through the scene. It felt so real and true. Just as many will empathise with; that moment where you declare love and the other reciprocates and you have the joy, embarrassment – if you’ve been sparring partners – a kind of denial and the heightened vulnerability, connection and delight. It tore at the heart in the most beautiful way.

But before they can be together, there is one thing he has to do for her – ‘Kill Claudio!’

And we have almost reached the denouement… but not before we have another very amusing scene between DT and the young boy involving a keyboard and leading to some more wonderful banter between B&B now in love… and an almost kiss! I was longing for it! Whilst also willing the play not to end!

At the repeat wedding – following a brilliantly powerful funeral scene, in which Claudio anguishes along to music from a loud, echoing ghetto-blaster – Claudio marries Hero’s ‘cousin’ to discover it is Hero herself.

Benedick asks the friar to marry him to Beatrice. Of course he has to ask her too! And they finally kiss to great whoops of delight from the audience.

They end, as the play began, with dancing.


During the curtain calls there were the best smiles you can imagine on DT and CTs faces. They seemed to enjoy it as much as the audience.
I was shaking as I stood up to applaud them.


As arranged I met my friends at the stage door.
DT was already out and signing autographs. How does he change so quickly?!
I managed to get a spot where I probably wasn’t supposed to be – kind of in the way of other actors coming out – but I wasn’t moved on – maybe the presence of my walking stick helped. I watched DT as he made his way along the line – happily signing and smiling in people’s photos – so open and delightful. I was wearing his Headway doodle T-shirt – kind of for him and also in the hopes of attracting his attention ;). Then he made it to me. I think he saw the T-shirt but didn’t comment. He signed the programme page with his picture on. And then went on to the next person, and then somehow he didn’t know who to go to next, and returned to me! I said he’d already signed for me and he replied ‘I could do you twice’ – okay maybe I’m misremembering that a little – but it was so sweet and funny – and yet it felt greedy to accept – a friend behind me handed me her flyer and I handed it to him to sign.
And then CT… SO lovely in person! (Friend later said how beautiful her hair is and how red-heads should rule the world! Made me so proud that I’m a strawberry blond! We also talked about how TV makes people fatter and distorted and how they look even better in person.) As I gave CT my programme to sign, I told her the performance was so good and she replied ‘Thank you, my darling’.

I am going again! Once is totally amazing but this is must-see several times over! It’s a drug and I’m addicted to that high!



Afterthought – courtesy of comments from my friends:
It was noted how quickly the conspirators are forgiven in the original compared to the Shakespeare Retold version in which Hero also keeps Claudio waiting and does not marry him; the trust destroyed between them. Maybe this reflects Shakespeare’s comedies in which he tends not to stay long with the ‘bad stuff’. Or perhaps it’s a historical thing and of his time when younger women of that ripe-to-be-married age didn’t have as much power to stand up for themselves in the same way as they do now and needed to have their honour defended by chivalrous men.

Much Ado About Nothing – Review by TheRestrictedReviewer © 2011


Twitter: @RestrictReview